Voicebox bid feedback from CLG

March 31, 2009 by Helen Milner · Leave a Comment 

In the spirit of the open way in which we developed the Voicebox bid for Digital Mentors, I wanted to share with you the feedback we’ve had from CLG. There’s a lot in here which is positive and also some lessons which we need to learn. Overall, it seems that the Media Trust’s bid met more of the criteria for what CLG were looking for from the Digital Mentors project, so it must have been a great bid. We’re really looking forward to finding out more about Media Trust’s plans.

Download the PDF of CLG’s feedback on the Voicebox bid.

As I’ve said before, even though we’re very disappointed with the outcome, the process of developing the bid has to go down as our most successful failure of the last year. Open collaboration has now become an approach we’re embedding within our organisational culture.

We’re currently looking at how we can encourage decision-makers to move towards more open policymaking and support practitioners to share ideas and good practice via a Digital Engagement blog. Please come and take part at www.digitalengagement.org. In the coming weeks and months, we aim to use the site to develop a bottom-up Digital Manifesto which can be used by partners and presented to government to inform policymakers. We’re in the very early stages of this, so please let us have your feedback about ideas for shaping the blog.

Thanks again for all your support for the Digital Mentors bid and I’m sorry we’ve not been successful.

Timetable and process for development of the Digital Mentors bid

December 18, 2008 by Ben Brown · 7 Comments 

As you’re aware, CLG has now sent us the Digital Mentors ITT, a copy of which is available to view here. You’ll note that the closing date for applications has been put back slightly to 5pm on Wednesday 4 February.

I would recommend reading the ITT as it provides valuable information about what the Digital Mentors programme should deliver, which may (subject to your feedback) affect the current thinking on how our bid should be built.

In terms of ‘the process’ moving forward, I propose:

  • By Tuesday 6 January - to have received all your feedback on a preferred delivery model via the Voicebox blog. Please refer here for a couple of suggestions which have already been put forward by Anne Faulkner and Mike Amos-Simpson (thanks both!). NOW is your chance to critique these against the backdrop of what CLG wish to have delivered, or to propose new ones. Please add to the existing thread (link shown above) with any edits or new models you would like to have considered for the Voicebox bid.
  • By Tuesday 6 January - for UK online centres to have received a clear indication from any organisation interested in a funded role to lead a workstream. Please note we are NOT seeking to identify ‘demonstrator projects’ or ‘trainers’ at this stage. We’ve reviewed the original list of workstreams against what we know now. We believe there are four key workstreams to deliver this work, as follows:
    • Project Management of the programme (which includes within its remit ‘sustainability’ plus the project management of the ‘demonstrator projects’. This workstream will be delivered by UK online centres.
    • Research and Mapping
    • External communications
    • Training and toolkits

We anticipate that there will be other funded roles supporting some of these workstreams, which will be considered after the workstream leads have been established.

Any organisations wishing to lead on one of the three remaining workstreams should email me (bbrown@ufi.com) no later than 5pm on Monday 5 January clearly identifying your workstream of choice. Shortly after, I will publish the names of the organisations that have contacted me on the Voicebox blog.

  • On Thursday 15 January - The potential workstream leads will be invited to meet in London for a strategy session. The aim of the meeting will be to:
    • Run through the delivery model, and sign it off
    • Agree the role and responsibility of each workstream
    • Agree the key tasks required by each workstream

We expect the session to cover a lot of ground; therefore please expect to be involved for the whole day. During the meeting, we’ll announce the process for the appointment of the workstream leads itself.

  • By noon on Tuesday 20 January - this will be the deadline for the submission of a short application form for workstream lead candidates.
  • By close of business Wednesday 21 January - The UK online centres bid writing team will make the final decision on who will lead each of the work streams.
  • On Friday 23 January - meeting of all collaborators in the Voicebox bid in London to clarify ideas about the Digital Mentors approach
  • Wednesday 4 February - Deadline for response to the ITT

Final Digital Mentor specification issued

December 16, 2008 by Voicebox · 3 Comments 

The next stage of the digital mentors process is now underway, with the specification for the tender now sent out to the 5 consortia bidding for the fund.

You can download a PDF of the document here.

We hope that all Voiceboxers will take a good look at the document and see how they could contribute, both in terms of ideas and also where they could take a lead in developing that part of the bid and being an integral part of the consortium delivering it.

Please do leave your comments in this post - or write a blog post of your own. If you haven’t got an account to do this, all you need to do is email admin@voice-box.org.uk to get one.